- This topic has 847 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 1 week, 1 day ago by
.
-
Posts
-
the apparent rule that a canceller can’t cancel himself or his own ship, except the printed card rule says “within S of this ship” and his own ship is quite literally within S of itself
“Within S of this ship” specifically begins at the outermost edge of the ship’s model silohuette. By definition, it is not, in fact, within S of itself.
Helpful explanation from Woelf
Thanks a lot. Like I get it, some of those combos can be really crazy if you do it right (like swoop in with captain to shoot and maybe slap in an extra action via SAT/SAC, and then zoom away with reverse captain and a canceller to ensure they don’t chase after you). It just seemed odd since some of the PC just goes “nope that combo isn’t allowed” when crew like DJC Hawkins exists, showing clear intent the devs wanted it to exist (at least at that time). Does this mean crew like DJC Hawkins are kinda just “dead weight” since they can only do a “one or the other” choice?
“Within S of this ship” specifically begins at the outermost edge of the ship’s model silohuette. By definition, it is not, in fact, within S of itself.
See though, THIS is exactly what I’m talking about. Like I can absolutely agree with this rule based on “tournament logic” (i.e. this prevents my good buddy Fiore from being a super duper international canceller with no downsides at all), but nothing in the official rules says this. And if I’m going to get nerdy about it, the origin point of a line is in fact inside the line as well (i.e. the ship’s model silhouette is part of the ship, and is therefore within S of itself).
I’ll stop my silly ranting though as to prevent wasting discussion space here. I appreciate the answers, since they help clarify my confusion.
Suppose a ship finds Buried Treasure (or Plunder), and that treasure is later lost in a boarding party to an enemy ship. Does the loosing a turn aspect of those treasures apply to the ship that took them in the boarding party?
Ship A finds Buried Treasure(BT) and looses a turn and establishes value. Ship A is later boarded by enemy ship B. Ship B wins the boarding party and takes BT. Does ship B lose a turn, but keep the established value of BT?
Neither treasure seem to have a Code entry.
Suppose a ship finds Buried Treasure (or Plunder), and that treasure is later lost in a boarding party to an enemy ship. Does the loosing a turn aspect of those treasures apply to the ship that took them in the boarding party?
Ship A finds Buried Treasure(BT) and looses a turn and establishes value. Ship A is later boarded by enemy ship B. Ship B wins the boarding party and takes BT. Does ship B lose a turn, but keep the established value of BT?
Neither treasure seem to have a Code entry.
Play them both as written. Any time a ship loads one, it can’t be given actions on its next turn, and then the value resets.
Thematically, Buried Treasure is a little weird, but it could represent the crew fighting over the contents and the value could change based on who they can sell it to when they get to port.
For ships that can stern turn, I assume that rotation “sweeps” across the playing surface? (and the ship needs a clear path, rather than getting picked up and placed, though the Code mentions the latter under Moving)
Also, do you think the Home Island Raider ability should have been handled differently? Similar to boarding parties, I don’t think it should be the loser’s choice – either have the winner choose, or make it a random coin. Of course, if the winner chooses, then they get to see all the coins on the enemy HI (in multiplayer at least), which can be a big information advantage too.
For ships that can stern turn, I assume that rotation “sweeps” across the playing surface? (and the ship needs a clear path, rather than getting picked up and placed, though the Code mentions the latter under Moving)
The stern turn is written as just a rotation, so you do not get to pick up the ship like with a normal segment. You aren’t able to rotate through things, unless there’s enough clear space to rotate entirely around it in the opposite direction.
Also, do you think the Home Island Raider ability should have been handled differently? Similar to boarding parties, I don’t think it should be the loser’s choice – either have the winner choose, or make it a random coin. Of course, if the winner chooses, then they get to see all the coins on the enemy HI (in multiplayer at least), which can be a big information advantage too.
I think it was designed/written with the standard two-player rules in mind, where all treasure would be face up and visible on home islands, and when played like that it would work fine to let the raider choose what to take. But, like you said, Multiplayer (or two playing using the MP rules) is where it breaks, and why it gets put under the general rule where the person losing the item chooses. Being able to look at everything there could be way too powerful, and would slow the game down if the player using it had to stop and look through/count up everything instead just taking the first good coin they find.
Something in between might be good, where the HI owner would have to reveal a certain number of coins (4 or 5?) and then the raider could pick from those. Maybe with the added restriction that all of the values shown had to be different (if possible), so you couldn’t just flip a bunch of 1s and 2s.
Apologies if I’ve asked this before….
Links
Multiple different crew may be linked to a single ship at once, but each crew can link with only one other crew or ship at a time unless an ability specifically allows additional links to be created.
How many cargo spaces would a ship gain if it carried all three Knights of Malta at once? (Don Rafael Y de Teresa, Roderick the Pure, Benoit de Marseilles)
All three of them link to the other two. The rule seems to imply that a ship would only get +1 cargo from having all three of them – if two link to each other, then the third one is the odd man out. Or, Don links to Roderick and Roderick links to Benoit, but Benoit can’t link to Don?
Also, do Marines stack?
Apologies if I’ve asked this before….
Links
Multiple different crew may be linked to a single ship at once, but each crew can link with only one other crew or ship at a time unless an ability specifically allows additional links to be created.
How many cargo spaces would a ship gain if it carried all three Knights of Malta at once? (Don Rafael Y de Teresa, Roderick the Pure, Benoit de Marseilles)
All three of them link to the other two. The rule seems to imply that a ship would only get +1 cargo from having all three of them – if two link to each other, then the third one is the odd man out. Or, Don links to Roderick and Roderick links to Benoit, but Benoit can’t link to Don?
The links apply in both directions, so two of them would link to each other giving a single +1, and the third would be left out. Essentially, all three could fit into a ship with only two spaces available.
That trio only seems to exist for flavor reasons; I can’t think of any scenario where using all three together on a single ship would be even remotely beneficial. Even putting two of them together is stretch.
Also, do Marines stack?
The no-stacking rule does apply to them so only one could shoot… while on a ship.
The text of the rule does not refer to islands, probably because Marines are the only crew that breaks the normal rule about using abilities there, so multiples on an island could all shoot.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.